The Trump administration is now reportedly considering a significant reduction of American troops stationed in South Korea, a move that could heighten concerns among U.S. allies about Washington’s commitment to regional stability.
Military officials have disclosed plans to withdraw approximately 4,500 service members, potentially relocating them to other strategic locations within the Indo-Pacific, such as Guam.
This proposal is part of an informal policy review regarding North Korea and has not yet reached President Trump. It is one of several options being debated among senior officials, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell emphasized the U.S. commitment to South Korea, stating, “Our alliance is ironclad,” while clarifying that there are no immediate plans for a troop drawdown.
Since his first term, Trump has contemplated altering the U.S. military footprint in South Korea, where around 28,500 troops are currently stationed.
However, senior military leaders have recently cautioned against any reductions. In congressional testimony, Army Gen. Xavier Brunson, who oversees U.S. forces in Korea, warned that decreasing troop levels could be detrimental to U.S. military readiness.
Similarly, Adm. Samuel Paparo, the region’s top commander, stressed that removing forces from South Korea would inherently compromise the U.S. ability to successfully engage in future conflicts.
U.S. officials indicate that any decision regarding troop levels will depend heavily on the evolving situation in Ukraine and the administration’s ongoing support for Kyiv.
A potential troop withdrawal from South Korea could elicit alarm among allies in the Indo-Pacific, particularly as South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines rely on American military presence for their security and regional power projection.
The U.S. military’s presence in South Korea has historically served as a deterrent against North Korean aggression and as a counterbalance to China, which has been increasingly assertive in the South China Sea and has raised tensions over Taiwan.
While relocating troops from the Korean Peninsula to locations like Guam might alleviate some concerns about military readiness, it remains a complex decision fraught with geopolitical implications.
Guam has emerged as a pivotal hub for U.S. forces, strategically positioned to respond to potential conflicts while remaining less accessible to Chinese military forces.
During his recent trip to Asia, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reiterated the importance of re-establishing deterrence in the region, promising an “unprecedented” commitment to strengthening alliances.
As discussions continue, the implications of any troop withdrawal will resonate throughout the Indo-Pacific, potentially reshaping the security landscape and the U.S.’s role in maintaining stability in a region marked by rising tensions.
[READ MORE: U.S. and Iran Work Towards Framework for Potential Nuclear Deal]
